![]() If you want to delve into the subject, we recommend reading Garrison's publication et al from 2013: Performance-Based risk-sharing arrangements - good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation. Therefore, it is their duty that the design of the agreement, the outcomes to be evaluated and the definitions of success or not of the intervention, satisfy the interests of all the actors involved and their different points of view. Note that both the creator of the technology and the logistics operator and the payer have a different view of the concept of value that brings a new technology. Economix is like economics 101 in pictures. Is it worth investing in the generation of local evidence to generate possible savings through a better allocation of resources? Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Economix: How and Why. In this way, you can know if the patient group technology goal (which is determined based on clinical evidence) is really the group that would benefit from using this in the local context. Remember these agreements must be focused on the health outcomes of patients.įinally, it should be added that the decision to enter into these agreements or not is also subject to an analysis of uncertainty: The result of the studies, within the framework of joint venture agreements, is generally information that proves the suitability of the use of a technology in a cohort of patients. ![]() The price, refund or rental of the product must be linked to the results of the data collection program. ![]() The collection of information, agreed in the joint risk agreement, must begin in the period after regulatory approvalThis does not mean that the data generated must be presented as post-marketing epidemiological evidence.The latter would be better because decisions would be made based on information from local patients. The collection may be based on overall results from a population or on the follow-up of individual patients. There must be a data collection program, which is the most appropriate way to establish the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of the technology of interest.In this way, it can be said that it is a investment that reduces uncertainty They must propose an innovative and different way of distributing risk, compared to traditional payer-provider agreements.(4 mai) et au séminaire Lunch (11 mai), il donnera. ![]() Outre ses interventions au GT IA (4 mai) et au séminaire Lunch (11 mai), il donnera un cours de deux heures le 10 mai de 13h à 15h en salle G513 sur le thème suivant. Human Action (4-Volume Set) - Ludwig von Mises Value, Historicity. Nejat Anbarci (Université de Durham) fera un séjour à EconomiX en tant que professeur invité du 28 avril au 11 mai. Therefore, the question arises, what characteristics should this type of agreement have? How and Why Our Economy Works (and Doesnt Work), in Words and Pictures. When Privatization Increases Public Spending by. Abrams Comic Arts, 19.95 trade paper (304p) ISBN 978-0-8109-8839-2. Layoffs and Lemons, Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4 characteristics of a good JV arrangementĪ risk-sharing arrangement provides the payer with sufficient evidence to make a decision regarding the performance uncertainty of a new product. Economix: How Our Economy Works (and Doesnt Work). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |